I read through one of my fellow student's
(Ditiro Tupaemang) thesis, he speaks about the value of design. He discusses
how people who have access to design programs get comfortable in the idea that
they are designers only because they can operate the system. They have
no design training or whatsoever the only thing they know how to do is getting
pictures together without concepts and meaning.
Even work that has been done by individuals that are not creative people or did not study creative they utilize minimalism in a poor manner because design is about concepts abstraction, starting of with representational to non-representational work. This jeopardizes the essence of Design in all the basic senses because this self taught look at the simplest image the can lay on a back ground with no knowledge of the elements and principles of design, the final work may appear minimal but yet the lack of these principle establishes an idea or a conclusion in other people's minds that minimalist design don't have a meaning, which is untrue no matter how minimalistic visuals may be the professional creative people create this type of work to bring a special meaning and that is why they follow the elements and principles, they also give themselves time to work from very strong and meaningful concepts.
I agree with his topic in the sense that, this people who are not designers they leave no meaning to minimalism because then their work has no concept and therefore it has no firm meaning and the audience are deprived of the opportunity to understand, if a message is not clearly thought through for it to have visual effect then it is pointless to have the message displayed to the public. Ditiro's paper brings strong enthusiasm to minimal work out there, whether they have gone through principle of design or not. I say this are the kind of people who leave no value to Minimalism do you agree?